The AC also sucks statswise, inflates the price, and cant be used at the same time as the maingun French Tanks get their coax autocannon because it is a coax autocannon (unique feature), not because of "french bias". Flamerthrowers, napalm Launchers and AGLs dominate infantry fights, not MGs Speaking of, you never got back to me about your log-in name so I can add you to my friends list for when I play? I would point you to the current infantry warfare mechanics where the higher Rate of Fire for LMGs play a deciding role (hence why troops equipped with the M249 outperform those equipped with the M240 or M60), so it's not so much the LMG3 stats being OP, but that infantry warfare needs tweaking, the way napalm/flamethrowers were godly in ALB. I'm still not sure what you're trying to tell me here, and where the blatant French bias is, and I sure hope you're not going to end up telling me the same thing Sp4m told me the last time I talked to him on TS, that is to say that there's an obvious French bias because the real French army is shit because it surrenders and got beaten by the English at Waterloo. So there's a "blatant" French bias (AMX-32/40, Rafale) because there's a Eurcorps bias, because Germany has the Marder 2 and borked LMG3 stats.? No not really, Eugen french bias has been obvious since forever What part of "Honcorps units are statistically better than most other units for the same price point" don't you understandĭo I need to throw pages of LMG3 stats at you?įrench/euro bias is hilariously blatant across almost all units in honcorps While France as a playable nation has its share of issues that I find fault with (15-man commando teams that shouldnt exist for one, the lack of a Mirage 2000D, imaginary AMX-32/40 series), it's hardly game-breaking.Īt this point, you may as well show me what you consider an OP deck, because other than a Motorized French Deck, I don't see the other specialized French decks really worth playing (aside from a Afghanistan-like map specific special forces deck). So which is it then? Is France OP? Is Germany OP? Is the Eurocorps Coalition itself OP?Īll I've been telling you from the start is that the Coalition system itself is borked, and that when you include imaginary units like the G11 and Marder 2, and combine two nations that have made major efforts to modernize their military (at the end of the time frame allowance in Red Dragon), their equipment will be understandably top-notch compared to the US. Trying to deny this is like pissing up a wall No not really, Eugen french bias has been obvious since forever (why are frenchietanks the only ones who get the coaxl guns?) The complaints would've been similar if you had a UK-US coalition going, or a UK-NL coalition (assuming NL was a playable nation)Ī UK-NL coalition would be quite capable on paper, with plenty of AH-64s, a solid selection of air, Challengers with Leopards, and very solid marine infantry units. Then that's a problem of the Coalition system then isn't it, where the Coalition in question consists of two nations that highly modernized (especially the French) their armed forces towards 1992? It doesn't help that the Marder 2 doesn't even exist outside its prototype form - and that the Marder 2 I've seen it plenty of times being used by players, as opposed to the prototype French six wheeled VAB-120 which I hardly see anyone use (and yes, I will admit that I spam that thing for smoke.) Not even going to touch the imaginary weapon that is the G-11.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |